05 July 2008

erti zalim...

Leave a Comment

assalamualaikum

tertarik ngan artikel yang bertajuk "Diantara Guantanamo Camp & Kamunting" tulisan daripada saifulislam.com. setelah meneliti sumber2 dari Harakah Daily dan beberapa buah artkel yang bukan berpaksikan media berat sebelah seperti akhbar2 yang leh dikatakan tidak jujur dalam melaporkan kepada rakyat..paham2 je la akhbar apa yang saya maksudkan

Sama2 la kita sedekah kan baca al fatihah buat Allahyarhamah Adik Aina Mardhiah Bte Sahrial. Smoga Allah tempatkan bersama2 dengan golongan yang berada di jalan yang lurus.

Sedey..cukup sedey . Anak yang ditinggalkan lantas En Sharial yang dituduh bawah Internal Security Act (ISA) di humban ke dalam neraka di Kamunting. Tiada bukti yang jelas dan nyata untuk mensabitkan beliau ke sana. Lantasan itu , keluarga menjadi kucar kacir . Berkat kesabaran isteri beliau menjaga amanah suami untuk membesarkan anak2 dalam keadaan yg sungguh dhaif , smoga Allah berikan kekuatan yang tinggi kepada sume isteri2 tahanan ISA. Aminn Ya Rabbal 'Alamin.

Pedia dia ISA Malaysian version ini. Saya copy n paste kat bawah ni

The Internal Security Act 1960 (ISA) (Malay: Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri) is a preventive detention law in force in Malaysia. The legislation was inherited by Malaysia after it gained independence from Britain in 1957. In essence, it allows for the arrest of any person without the need for trial in certain defined circumstances. Malaysia is one of the few countries in the world whose Constitution allows for preventive detention during peacetime without safeguards that elsewhere are understood to be basic requirements for protecting fundamental human rights.

Preventive detention first became a feature of the then Malaya in 1948 primarily to combat the armed insurgency of the Malayan Communist Party. The Emergency Regulations Ordinance 1948 was made, following the proclamation of an emergency, by the British High Commissioner Sir Edward Gent. It allowed the detention of persons for any period not exceeding one year. The 1948 ordinance was primarily made to counter acts of violence and, conceivably, preventive detention was meant to be temporary in application. The emergency ended in 1960 and with it ended the powers contained in the that ordinance as it was repealed. The power of preventive detention was however not relinquished and in fact became an embedded feature of Malaysian law. In 1960 itself, the government passed the Internal Security Act under Article 149 of the Malaysian Constitution. It permitted the detention, at the discretion of the Home Minister, without charge or trial of any person in respect of whom the Home Minister was satisfied that such detention was necessary to prevent him or her from acting in any manner prejudicial to national security or to the maintenance of essential services or to the economic life in Malaysia. The ISA is one of the most controversial Acts enacted under Article 149 of the Malaysian Constitution.

Section 8(1) of the ISA provides that ‘(i)f the minister is satisfied that the detention of any person is necessary …’ then s/he may issue an order for his/her detention. The three grounds given in Section 8(1) upon which the order may be based is where a person has acted in any manner prejudicial to the:

a) security of Malaysia or part thereof; or
b) maintenance of essential services; or
c) economic life.
Tu serba ringkas je...nak baca pe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Security_Act_(Malaysia)
So secara kesimpulannya.. secara logiknya sapa yang setuju bahwa akta ni boleh digunapakai lagi
?? Anda pandai menilai ngan mata hati anda sendiri.
Bagaimanakah kalo ia nya terjadi pada diri anda? Ditangkap tanpa bicara pastu tak bg kuar sampaikan ade kes2 kecemasan yg berlaku seperti En Shahrial .. So pikir2 kan la yer

0 Komen: